In recent years, arctic sovereignty has resurfaced as a political,
economic and security concern. Increased military presence by Nordic nations
induced by climate change and the prospect of a manoeuvrable passage has
increased interest in the territory's position and resources. Since the late
19th century the arctic has been coveted by nations seeking to harvest its
potential. The Arctic’s native cultures have been on the front lines of
southern military, mining and territorial speculations.
For most, the Arctic is either completely unknown or a potential
economic goldmine. Canadian author Farley Mowat’s literature compellingly illustrated
the tension between climate, culture and southern influence. The issue of
housing became central to this tension and was exacerbated as the government
took responsibility for the Inuit in Canada at the beginning of the 20th
century.
Global conflicts further pressured development in the North as the
American military sought to establish a presence and a «distant early
warning line» to protect
against potential soviet attacks from the North. During the cold war many
military outposts were colonised increasing the friction between southern
sedentary culture and the Inuit transient lifestyle.
Many of the housing experiments or habitable boxes shipped north to
improve housing conditions demonstrate the discord between north and south as they
ignored cultural needs, lifestyle and most surprisingly climate.
The government subsidized House types that were shipped in modules or
kits. All shared southern building techniques and materials and considered ease
of assembly and transport as the two primary criteria for design. The Angirraq shelter
was a small simple 16 foot by 24 foot «kit of parts» structure of stressed skin
modular panels. The stressed skin panels built form standard two by four
framing were covered in plywood and packed with Glass fibre insulation.
The sandwich construction was neither vented nor protected against
condensation or air infiltration. The simple volume with a shed roof and large
overhangs was proposed to contrast the traditional pitched roofs associated
with the prefabricated imported systems. The modular system of panels for walls
and roofs optimized transport and repetitive production allowing no on-site
changes, customization, and little consideration for the needs of the Inuit
hunter/gatherer.
This type of experiment illustrates
the type of prefabrication that was synonymous with northern colonization that
seemed to disregard the necessary cultural significance of housing strategies.
from Low Cost Prefabrication in Arctic Houses : http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic19-2-192.pdf |
No comments:
Post a Comment