Manufactured housing and
prefabricated architecture as two distant theoretical relatives evolved from
the conceptual distance modernity shaped between architecture and building. The
modern architect’s preoccupation with mass housing rested on the meeting of
immense housing demand, conflict and evolving manufacturing possibilities. The post-war
massive building programs lead to great architectural exploration and massive
entrepreneurial undertakings of tract housing. From this confluence, housing
and architecture converged and then seemed to follow different paths.
Post war high modernism (Scott) noted as a technical condition that would
improve social conditions, was well represented in architecture and
developed a discipline articulated on values somewhat distant from problems of
building. The disconnection between housing and architecture is still
illustrated today as manufactured housing has only marginal links to
architecture and architects have only a marginal aesthetic interest in the
industrialization of housing. Late modern experiments show this detachment from
building but also demonstrate a growing appeal for the industrial, technical
and engineering prowess of the space age.
Industrial production, mobility and
flexibility became focal points of how architecture related to building
systems. Plastics and specifically glass fibre reinforced plastic was the
flagship material of this new architecture. From prefabricated bathroom
capsules to aggregated modular matrix structures, architecture explored new
housing types. Although innovative and optimistic, it can be argued that this
further separated architects from housing.
Choosing an emblematic project that
relates high modernism and architecture is a difficult task because of the
great diversity and quantity of experimental projects. Patented systems range
from suspended mobile units to stacked units and to mobile pods. The «transportable
units» by Angela Hareiter addressed all the areas of study linked to high
modernism as it relates to architecture in an ambitious dwelling tower:
futuristic city systems, clip-on architecture, service cores, flexibility,
adaptability, and unit mobility. The central vertical core infrastructure
provided an outlet for services onto which each individual industrialized and
moulded stressed skin unit could be plugged into and unplugged to suit
society’s evolving needs. The collected units braced and completed the tower’s
structural core system. Units were to be hoisted by crane or deposited by
helicopter and linked to the structural core. The clip-on strategy failed to
materialize but these building systems advanced assembly of parts as a 20th
century architectural aesthetic.
Mobile units - Clip-on structural system |
No comments:
Post a Comment