As housing demand increases and supply festers because of aggravating construction challenges, policy makers are surveying offsite construction as a quick fix to a systemic problem. Housing provision is not only related to productivity but should also address changing lifestyles, demographic fluctuations, and affordability which require comprehensive governance beyond design and production. The catalogue of housing types and the pre-approved pattern building have been proposed as potential avenues for boosting supply.
The catalogue was explored by Canadian housing authority (CMHC) in the 50s and 60s and led to the construction of many homes responding to the post war baby-boom. Architects were given an opportunity to contribute archetypes for the nuclear family in a suburban setting. Articulated to house similarities private industry developed high levels of standardized designs and construction strategies. While not prefabricated, the catalogue certainly pushed low value-added industrialized components in every suburban tract; the timber platform frame was abundantly used.
Similar normalization and socialist policies in post-war Europe deployed reinforced concrete precast panels as the system of choice for replicable collective blocks. The «pattern» large panel edifice was an exercise in standardization akin to the single-family dwelling but with the added value of serializing a kit-of-panel elements to be used en-masse. Both systems, lightweight timber and reinforced concrete, were made affordable by their large-scale use. The catalogue and the typical block directed straightforward solutions to housing supply - repeatable designs that could be patterned and predetermined to harmonize supply chains economically federating all required materials and methods.
Critiqued over and over, today this regularity, while not a comprehensive solution to the current housing crisis is being promoted once again arguing that housing provision is slowed by design and approvals; remove architects from the planning process, simplify permitting, its associated delays, offer model buildings, and housing will go up quicker. This type of short-sighted planning is partially what killed prefab’s potentials through enduring prejudices. Supporting creative initiatives toward innovative and affordable solutions for contemporary needs, may take more time to develop, but the current crisis requires a holistic approach to avoid offsite bearing blamed once again for systemic challenges.
 |
| Left: CMHC catalogue design by R.T. Affleck ; Right: Pattern large panel blocks for a new town (USSR) |
No comments:
Post a Comment