Along with housing, educational buildings have long
been a testing ground for industrialized building systems. Their repetitive
nature in matters of space requirements and organization historically made a persuasive
argument for their mass production. While school interior spaces remain fairly straightforward,
classrooms, gymnasiums and a myriad of services from libraries to swimming
pools and cafeteria, the capacity to receive and serve a varying number of
students has often been addressed by modularity in matters of design and
construction. As the need for housing is linked to demographic fluctuations so
is the need for school buildings that are malleable enough to adapt to the varying
needs. Among other comparable strategies, Ezra Ehrenkrantz’s SCSD system
developed in the 1960s spoke to the requirement for change by deploying a dimensionally
coordinated systemic approach to school building construction.
Prefab classrooms have repeatedly popped up adjacent
to school buildings as a reaction to swiftly changing populations. This ability
to rapidly supplement a classroom space in any context was the basis of many
experiments throughout the 20th century. Challenging the emergency approach of crudely
adding a box, professor Theodore Larson from the University of Michigan propositioned
a steel-framed reversible modular kit of parts in 1951 based on the Unistrut
building system. The simple steel skeleton covered in a smartly orientated glass
curtain wall defined the very essence of the modernist zeitgeist: the flexible
and adaptable open plan.
Recently Los Angeles-based Studio Jantzen have developed a related
concept. Using a timber post and beam structure, the project endeavours to redefine
an aesthetic potential and intends to be a more sustainable version of an
almost disposable building typology. The series of rigid frames echoes what Larson
had proposed. The large roof overhang defines a canopy to control interior
lighting while offering an uninterrupted relationship with the outdoors. Both
projects from different eras critique the container-type classrooms, which
offer little spatial and environmental quality. Studio Jantzen’s modern details
including floor to ceiling glass, sloping roof spaces, and exposed structure further
relate the two projects tectonically and reveal the simple modernist axiom of
interior/exterior links allowing the classroom to be more of a setting rather
than a set space concentrated in one direction.
Left : Larson's project (1951) - Right : Studio Jansen's kit (2017) |