Moshe Safdie’s Habitat 67 designed and built as an experimental
prototype of collective housing for the 1967 World Fair in Montreal is
certainly one of the most recognizable and distinctive architectural
experiments of the 20th century. Renewing the modern tradition of demonstration
architecture, it was at once a knowledge incubator and a catalyst for
innovation. Proposed as the union of the single family dwelling with the
benefits of shared infrastructure, the pyramid shaped utopia of grouped living
shells or modules employed a rigorous geometric stacking informed by issues of
proximity, circulation and dynamic architectural movement. Engaging a need for
density, the experiment at the Man and
His World exhibition in Montreal spawned from academic design research
engendered multiple prototypes to be tested all over the world.
One of Safdie’s many proposals explored geometry and modularity with a
somewhat futuristic aesthetic. Somewhere between Japanese metabolism and Archigram’s
hyper-dense living mega-structures, Habitat New York II was to be built in New
York City's east harbour adjacent to the Brooklyn Bridge. The overall
composition resembled Habitat 67's pyramidal shape but exhibited a more complex
structural strategy. Slip-formed central cores or masts used for circulation
anchored catenary structural cables encased in concrete, which produced the sail-like
profile. The stacked modules were suspended from these stressed cables and
occupied the space between the arc segments and the vertical piers. The octagon
as opposed to rectangular prism was used as a basic building block combined in
multiple organisations both in plan and in section.
Reintroducing on the era’s plug and play capsule aesthetic each unit's
section related to its neighbouring unit. Flats were either one floor or split-level
«raumplan» configurations and
the resulting dense interactions were offset by rational placement of both
exterior spaces and openings onto magnificent views. The triangulated vertical
clusters were placed on site in a diagonal grid pattern that maximized openness
from the city to the harbour.
The somewhat artificial geometric aesthetic was a major change from the
simplicity of Habitat 67. Habitat New York II was never built, due to lack of
funding. It is part of a series of experiments that endeavoured to bridge the
need to maximize social collective infrastructure with privacy and individual
dwelling units.
Habitat New York II - building section |
No comments:
Post a Comment