Saturday, June 11, 2016

Prefabrication experiments - 101 - Ferro House utility core


In architecture and construction,  industrialization was accompanied by an understanding that product, process and practice standardization was necessary in order to truly benefit from the potential quality and quantity afforded by modern manufacturing. Today’s construction industry still benefits from the developed classifications and dimensional normalisation which  catalogued, and pre-defined commercially accessible components for building. However, the challenges associated with this standardisation in matters of project documentation and system coordination specifically on-site system entanglement remain somewhat unresolved. Although systematized, professionals and builders stereotypically repeat similar inefficient processes on every project.

Throughout the 20th century, industrialists and architects sought to address these challenges through the use of building sub-assemblies combining off-site production and coordination of multiple components leveraged toward value-added design and fabrication. Highlighting these strategies is  the use of a plumbing wall, a utility wall, a service core or a preassembled kitchen and bath cluster as complex spatial nucleus providing technical spaces in a completely integrated built-in unit.

Countless volumetric core or pod-based modules were designed to standardize serving spaces. The experimental «Ferro research house» built in the early 1960's, a Carl Koch (Techbuilt) and the Ferro cement company collaboration, proposed a preassembled wet core linked to a plumbing wall. The «L-shaped» factory assembled bath included a tub, sink, storage and counter space. Conceived, coordinated and fabricated off-site by potential qualified manufacturers, the preassembled module could be produced concurrently  to site work collapsing traditional building schedules and providing greater worker flexibility and safety. The standardized two-inch plumbing wall, fixtures and built-ins streamlined the unit's design documents and reduced on-site coordination. As Carl Koch observed, «the objective of this approach is "units" instead of "pieces"». The units simplified spatial dimensioning and adaptability as the core liberated the surrounding spaces.


The utility core as an instrument relating flexible design with production efficiency has endured in architectural discourse and in industrial production. Many manufacturers produce these spatial clusters and the utility core is the subject of numerous patents. The information modelling capabilities associated with today's production could  further enhance the systemic integration promised by the Ferro experiment by imbedding a systemic intelligence enabling repair, replacement and general life span adaptability which has often been cited as the service core's shortcoming.

Ferro pre-assembled wet wall and bathroom components

No comments:

Post a Comment