Industrialized building systems and prefabricated building experiments
found their stride during the early 20th century. Their conceptual roots were meshed
with those of mass manufacturing. Their early proprietary nature limited the streamlining
of new building knowledge and furthermore confined their use. During the peak
of worldwide housing shortages many building systems developed as closed and self-directed
systems, as was the case for most mass-manufactured commodities.
Architecture and building culture in general progress through an open
exchange of ideas. Moreover, buildings are by definition open systems requiring
many retrofitting phases and strategies throughout their service lives. Closed,
patented or highly specialized industrial productions have been proven less adaptable
over time. Replacement parts, pieces or alterations are contingent to the
closed system’s agility, continuous production and economic success. During the
second half of the 20th century, the required programmatic flexibility
of buildings inspired a more open approach to building systems: coordinated
sub-systems based on dimensionally standardized components, parts and products toward
their straightforward assembly.
In Japan the «GSK» building systems for educational buildings typified
the idea of dimensional and systemic coordination and explored an «open source» cross-pollination of building
systems. Innovative and flexible teaching required more flexible schools.
Initiated by RIEF (The Research Institute for Educational Facilities) in 1971,
the process was founded on similar experiments undertaken in Great Britain (CLASP)
and the United States (SCSD) when those countries confronted their own demographic
demands for educational resources.
The
RIEF instituted performance based specifications for industrial proposals providing
elements for eight building systems: structure, envelope, roof, interior walls,
ceiling/lighting, finishes, mechanical and electrical. The specifications were
technically sound in their requirements with quick, easy, and coordinated
assembly highlighting their overall methodology. The specifications demanded a
simple but rigorous planning grid of 900 x 900 x 900mm onto which room sizes,
heights and systems could be organized. The grid increased efficiency. Modern
systems of construction shared and still share this ideal of dimensional
modularity. Each company’s proposal was cross- evaluated, recorded, categorized
and became the basis for a pilot school project that combined specific submissions
toward the GSK building system. The RIEF’s process for GSK exemplifies the search
of an open source architectural language for variable and varying building
types.
Prefab concrete panel wall sub-assembly (example) |
No comments:
Post a Comment