The relationship between
industrialisation and building was founded on three principles: repetition, efficiency
and quantity. The search for efficiency and innovation was weighed against
traditional wood or masonry construction. Although industrialization offered
speed and new methods, building culture related and still relates to slowly
evolving trades, materials and methods. In order to rival traditional
techniques and crafts, industrialization aimed to lower costs either by repeating
processes, components and assemblies, by producing progressive experiments or by
challenging traditional shapes and architectural types.
The classic dome or circular arch
structure prompted experiments in almost every material: pre-cut geodesic
skeletal or panel structures, fold-up domes, assembled shell segments and
sprayed domes. The dome’s legacy as a robust
form resistant structure was conducive to prefabrication; it could be
engineered simply. Wallace Neff’s bubble houses are an example of domes used
for housing. Neff’s Domes were cast over inflatable plastic moulds known as
bubbles. Each dome could be a single housing unit or juxtaposed to form an
aggregated cellular housing structure. The inflatable moulds were light,
transportable, generated no waste and required few man-hours to erect.
Neff’s techniques were further
developed and commercialized by David South. South’s monolithic thin shell dome structures
employed and some still employ an inflatable polymer-based form or shape. Similar
to the earlier Neff experiments, air pressure keeps the dome’s shape in tension
during the moulding or spraying process. The domes are produced by spraying
either thermosetting resins, light air-entrained concrete, polyurethane
expanding foam or both a urethane layer and a concrete layer. The thin shell
hardens and cures to a strong thermal resistant half-sphere. This type of
monocoque dome employed one trade and simplified the complex procurement
process that came along with building a traditional structure.
The interior surface could be
finished with a cement-based coating or painted while the exterior surface of
the dome could be covered with a UV protector or also finished with a cement-based
coating. Available in multiple diameters, the domes were built in any context
and for a diversity of uses. The dome has crossed eras and has proven to be a
highly flexible structural system, however it has had less success as housing. The
prismatic shapes of classical, medieval and modern architecture have anchored
an aesthetic for dwelling that is difficult to sway from.
Left : Wallace Neff's bubble domes ; Right David South's patent drawings |
No comments:
Post a Comment