Manufacturing buildings
or large sub-assemblies in a plant reduces waste, optimises building
performance, and makes construction «leaner» and «greener». Factory production generally
increases value. Building system coordination in a controlled climate simplifies
quality control.
Transportation
methodology by air, sea or land of factory-produced components to building
sites must be built-in to the manufacturer’s overall production plan. Designing
for transport adds value. The steel chassis of the traditional mobile home
represents the combined value of a trailer, a floor, and a partial foundation.
As in the mobile
home, designing for packing and transport has influenced industrialized building
systems. Palace Corporation’s suitcase house, Buckminster Fuller’s
autonomous package or even the Liberty’s telescopic trailer house utilized
hinged, articulated or hydraulic mobility toward an on-site construction
strategy. These systems exemplify efficiently transporting and erecting
factory made buildings.
Combining factory
production, with an efficient transport strategy and minimal on site
manipulation has always been the prefabricator’s objective. From the
single-wide volume to prefabricated concrete building panels, transport
criteria defines the industry and a system’s viability in different
contexts. Transporting components to the arctic might require summer
maritime shipping, while trucking across a dense urban fabric might limit the
width and height of assemblies. The construction industry’s emblematic 4’x8’ module
was defined by railroad transport.
A marginally
applied strategy is the collapsing of a module into a flat pack. Multiple units
can then be piled onto a tractor-trailer and shipped. The Collapsible prefabricated
building (patent US 3731440 A) looked to combine
Off-site manufacturing with on site ease by articulating wall panels to fold into
a base «l» shaped panel to form a flat package or be deployed as a building
module. This invention allowed for quick erection by simply unfolding the
package. The invention is of particular interest because of the inventor’s
analysis of his contemporary building industry. His description validated that the
substantial savings made by the prefab process were offset by the extensive time
and effort that were still required on-site. His invention aimed to optimise
both transport and assembly. The mechanical mobility of this flat pack used a
simple articulated panel system to reduce the industry’s flaw: the absence of
an optimized coherent strategy from factory to site.
Collapsible prefabricated building (patent US 3731440 A) |
No comments:
Post a Comment