Industrialisation developed prefabrication for the generic production of
housing. The mass production strategies needed to successfully generate,
produce and deliver the factory made
house required the least amount of product differentiation. Architecture,
framed in its much larger perspective including prefabrication, has a more
site-specific objective. The long
lasting contradiction between prefabricated architecture and its difficulty in
addressing context has always been a challenge for prefab and a driving force
for the flexibility of on-site building.
Prefabricators seldom explored universal mass housing strategies that
address different contexts as this contradicts productivity of scale. One of
the marginal exceptions to this general rule was the Solar house designed by
George Fred Keck for The Green Ready-Built House Company. George Fred Keck, was
an American architect known for his work on exhibition houses; "the house of tomorrow" and «Chrystal glass house» both prototypes that
were built in Chicago in the 1930’s to display new building methods and design
strategies.
Both houses, although differing in plan, demonstrated Keck’s willingness
to optimize the use of solar energy. Predating solar passive housing strategies
by decades, Keck proposals made use of large glazed walls using double-glazed
insulated glass and an intelligent composition of rooms relating to the sun’s path.
The circular, decagon, plan of the «House
of tomorrow» built in 1933 used large insulating glass panels as a skin to
a standardised modular steel skeleton in composing what is referred to as
America’s first glass house.
While the Green's ready-built solar house did not use Keck’s the circular
plan or the completely standardized glass and steel components, the small
prefab house was designed for an optimal south facing lot with rooms on the
glazed side. The south-facing wall was composed of large windows, louvers and a
large horizontal sunshade optimizing heat gain in winter and shading in summer.
The «solar» house was a simple
rectangular plan using stressed skin panel construction. Keck also designed
variants of the plan for four different site configurations understanding that
the south facing lot strategy limited the proposal’s capacity to be adapted to
a greater number of sites reducing its scalability. The variability Keck
proposed tried to bridge the gap between industrialisation's need for the
generic and the architect's responsibility to understand context. This effort
to create a site-specific prefab had limited success and still remains a challenge
of the industrialisation of building systems.
Add from Popular Science August 1946 |
Pretty! This has been an extremely wonderful post.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for supplying these details.
My page - double glazed glass