Prefabrication experiments - 438 - Concrete Tube Utopias

 

The previous blog posts have discussed housing types from micro-dwellings to industrialized utopias and large-scale urban renewal proposals. Each motivated to efficiently supply quality dwellings for the masses affordably and with sufficient flexibility to respond to varying dispositions. Current generalized urbanization challenges existing models toward the production of dwellings while simultaneously reducing our collective environmental footprint.  Conventional housing construction is a slow go, fraught with planning delays, bogged permitting and symbolized by lagging productivity. 

 

Repurposing ready-made industrialized objects for housing urgencies is a recurring theme and has spawned an assortment of schemes including converted shipping containers or stacked mobile homes. While designed in different eras, two proposals demonstrate the cyclical nature of architects inspired by redirecting manufactured products for other uses. Guy Dessauges (Living Tubes, 1966; blog article 28) and James Law architecture have both represented concrete infrastructure pipe sections as modular building blocks for quickly putting flats together. Dessauge’s tubes were envisioned around a centralized service core or stacked three stories high composing a housing hive. The Opod Tube House (2017) proposal visualized in multiple contexts clearly borrows, consciously or subconsciously, from the same Zeitgeist.  

 

Can lessons be learned from these radical investigations for creating affordable housing or are they just exercises architects have come to adopt as their discipline’s way of addressing crises? The amount of rework needed to adapt products to housing is often absent from designs and sometimes asserts disciplinary caprice. The discipline’s «modern» heritage of rewiring industrial designs to imagine novel building systems reforming classic ways of building is entrenched in this type of poetic license that has often led to socially, economically and culturally untenable proposals. 

 

Most architects are far removed from economics, manufacturing and streamlined production that the only way they feel that they can contribute to solutions is by resorting to romantic views of prefabrication as the simple assembly of premade forms. The truth is that adapting ready-mades can be complex: mechanical systems, interior infill, site infrastructure and other retrofit requirements makes this type of stacking less than credible and financially unfeasible.

above: Opod; below: Living Tubes

Prefabrication experiments - 437 - XL(towers) - Vertical neighborhoods

 

Relating the advantages of the single-family dwelling (privacy, spatial distribution on multiple floors, four orientations for views and exterior spaces) with the benefits of collective housing (density, shared services, proximity) has inspired architects since industrialization created an magnifying need for affordable urban housing prototypes. The last few blog posts have referenced Le Corbusier's Unité d'habitation based on amassing rationalized two-floor flats, Metabolists’ plugins aggregated over shared towers along with an idealized view of a multi-floor infrastructure to accommodate homes represented in Site Architect’s Highrise of Homes (1981).

 

The flagship endeavor for this productive vision of high-rise suburban living is Habitat 67 constructed for the Man and his World exhibit in Montréal, Canada (1967). The modular prestressed and post-tensioned concrete mega-blocks were cast and amassed to create an architectural statement about the potential future of housing that never manifested. Still this architectural dream endures in its most at once naive and foreword looking manifestoes. 

 

Chicago studio Kwong Von Glinow  projected a tower of multi-story houses for Hong Kong. The design won first prize for the Hong Kong Pixel Homes competition in 2018. The modular boxes would be stacked up to four high to organize single houses and apartments vertically instead of the horizontal relationships conveyed in conventional planning. Juxtaposed single, couple and family units are intended as a type of vertical unit – a neighborhood - activating dynamic collective spaces between units. The interiors could be fit-out according to inhabitants’ needs and eventually evolve over time. While the theoretical proposal is rendered to showcase a mass to void relationship that allows for vertical patios, views and rich interior/exterior relationships, the real-life viability remains to be proven. Designed in groups of four stories, the proposal echoes the need for a type of primary support structure to carry each stacked neighborhood, which would allow for streamlined replication of modular units. As developed in a timber tall building in Norway, Treet, the four-story stack built on a infrastructure floor is a credible option for realizing this contemporary take on the vertical distribution of individualized dwellings.

left: Pixel competition design ; right: Treet section showing two «support» floors

Prefabrication experiments - 436 - XL(towers) - Stacked dwellings

 

Skewering identical floor plates on a vertical axis is the most common way of building dwelling towers. The inhabitable hives are optimized by aggregating units effectively around centralized service cores. Composing tall buildings with variable floorplates, while certainly less commonplace, has inspired many architectural proposals based on adaptable floors conceived as free indeterminate spaces tuned to present needs as well as being adjustable to change over time.

 

The tension between pragmatic building strategies and individualizable housing needs arguably also led to the invention of both the megastructure tower and the development of open building theory. SITE architects' evocative representation Highrise of Homes (1981) or Elmer Frey’s stacked mobile homes, both represent the underlying duality of any collective housing scheme of according common and private functions. The floor plate designed as infrastructure for any organizational scheme harmonizes these parameters and inspired examples of the support versus infill patterns related to Habraken's visions for mass housing.

 

Isay Weinfeld, IW Arquitetura's 360° tall building in São Paulo, Brazil is a contemporary vision of particularizing tower geometry with varying and open slabs. Each storey is composed of large spanning reinforced concrete, onsite cast, waffle slabs cantilevered from a rigorous grid of columns and central service core. Each floor is infilled with modularly organized flats shifted from one floor to the next in a pinwheel composition to enhance the tower’s dynamic form. Further, the 62 units are massed to create voids identified by their designers as yards revealing a vertical urban plan imagery for the tower. 

 

The stacking of identical units into an accommodating slab frame makes it possible to manufacture systems as completely replicable chunks without the habitual reinforcing required for lower modular units or elements to support their vertical neighbouring units. The 360° tower demonstrates the enduring architectural attraction for customizing interiors in a structure as a service rack of endless possibilities. This approach, while distant from Japanese Metabolists’ complete plug and play theories reveals how Sites' representation of an ideal customizable vertical city is still a forceful fantasy in architectural culture. 

top left: Highrise of Homes; top right: stacked mobile homes; bottom: 360° Tower

Prefabrication experiments - 435 - XL(towers) - Taller is better

 

Occupant protection is a fundamental purpose of housing. Defensive posture is usually defined by how a home is anchored to its locus. Dugout or elevated, position relative to ground plane symbolizes how humans delineate their territory and how they interact with other humans; The need to observe surroundings, showcase one's wealth or power, and dominate the environment stimulated the development of the tower house type. Cities in the middle-ages were stages of power struggles represented by the multiplication of elevated dwellings as devices for celebrating a family's wealth - taller was always better.

 

Verticality as an expression of wealth and power took on a manifestly modern connotation as new materials and construction methods made it possible to reach greater heights and spans unlocking a potential for spaces, commercial or residential, to be stacked democratizing what had been theretofore limited to the ultra-wealthy. Mechanization, steel, reinforced concrete and light curtain walls unleashed new industrial energies. The tower became a symbol of urbanity powering new cities into the twentieth century no longer related to one family. Granted, many private promoters and construction magnates were still sometimes controlled by a family who continued to prove their influence by harnessing resources and deploying them into magnificently tall buildings. 

 

The tower as a multi-unit dwelling typology is straightforward: flats are distributed, aggregated and piled around a central core containing mechanical distribution and circulation. Flat typologies, anchored to a core, can be one, two and sometimes three stories high with single, dual, triple or quadruple orientations depending on the core-to-flat configuration. The typical floor plate repeating the systemic relationship from floor to floor makes these edifices conducive to rationalized construction methods. 

 

Modular volumetric construction has been proposed, marginally applied and offers a glimpse into the strategy's potentials and limitations. While certainly formidable in terms of speed of construction, in conventional systems, lower boxes carry the weight of upper boxes. Tall prefab and modular construction using repetitive units imply the use of an expressed or hidden support structure or the particularized reinforcement of each manufactured box, which makes the seemingly simple stacking challenging in terms of mass production and can also increase construction costs. 

above: Bologna tower houses; below: Capsule tower by Kisho Kurokawa