Prefabrication experiments - 469 - Platform theory for scaling efficiencies

 

The current affordable housing crisis is driving policies for change in the construction industry and its supply chain sectors. Necessary steps toward efficiencies include reducing bureaucracy, increasing productivity and performance; Performance framed by climate change, requires low-carbon building solutions while increasing supply. Factory production using materials and methods that harmonize quality, quantity along with reducing construction's wastefulness and environmental footprint is promoted within the future of construction road maps toward decarbonization in many countries.  

 

Manufacturing principles can be deployed to increase efficiencies and have proven their worth in all industries with building construction lagging. Industrialized building has had some successful applications in architecture; modern timber, steel and concrete construction systems were directed to solve the housing crises of the interwar and postwar years. 

 

Timber framing used in tract housing, most notably in Levittowns, is a case in point where sawn lumber was dimensioned consistently and deployed to an incredible number of houses using similar spans, plans, and elements. Dimensional consistency within a well-established and understood supply chain is what made timber framing so scalable. The same type of scalable normalization was used in steel buildings for large hangars or storage facilities. Panelized reinforced concrete also used material normalization to become a formidable, industrialized building system in Europe. All three construction methods can be described as «platforms» geared to particular types; small spanning timber for houses, large-spanning steel for industrial buildings and fireproof concrete for multiunit buildings. 

 

Still, the one-off nature of the construction industry impedes the scalable standardization in supply chains required by manufacturing.  Industrial production applied to building calls for a comprehensive transformation toward an integrated process with platform theory at its core. Using the same platform - type relationship that led to the above-mentioned successes in processes and designs should be directed toward consistency in building design and production. Further cross-sector collaboration between manufacturers should be based on normalization to share challenges and offer opportunities for best practices to be streamlined throughout the industry. This would allow one-off singular projects to be based on repeatable details, components and manufactured elements - developing a mass-customizable approach in construction. 

Top left: Levittown mass production; bottom left: Typical concrete panel block; Right: a platform for combining residential spaces into diversified designs (Resolution 4 architecture)

Prefabrication experiments - 468 - Flexibility of on and offsite reinforced concrete

Whether cast on or offsite, reinforced concrete construction was generalized for collective housing in a relatively short period between the end of the 19th and the middle of the 20th century. Prized for its rapidity, strength, flexibility and fireproofing, the malleable material also sustained the invention of new industrialized building systems and their architectural potentials. Slabs and columns could take rationalized form-resistant shapes and heights difficult to achieve in conventional timber or masonry construction. Further, the open plans based on a rigorous grid of distanced posts or columns generated horizontal arrangement fields free from the structural constraints of customary bearing walls. Massive postwar rebuilds throughout Europe contributed to understanding the possibilities for these systems to be mass-produced and modulated for any context. 

 

In Italy during the late 1960s and early 1970s many collective housing blocks were erected by fostering the advantages of reinforced concrete with precast elements. Italian architect / designer, Angelo Mangiarotti planned a series of collective dwelling blocks which showcase the shared knowledge maturing in multiple countries. Born on February 16, 1921 in Milan, Mangiarotti graduated in architecture from the Milan Polytechnic in 1948. He met modern masters Frank Lloyd Wright, Walter Gropius, Mies van der Rohe and Konrad Wachsmann as a visiting professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago in the early 1950s, where prefabrication was extensively seen as the future of architecture and construction. 

 

After returning to Italy, Mangiarotti founded a studio, and investigated a building system that combined onsite cast concrete flat slabs with a modular precast curtain wall system hung from the perimeter of the concrete floors. Based on a strict modular grid, factory-made opaque or transparent vertical panels would simply slide and suspend from a horizontal modular lintel block anchored to the main structural slabs. A compositional interplay of vertical panels and windows varied the arrangement according to any customizable layout within the adaptable open plan. This hybrid onsite and offsite system was stacked to 8 stories at Monza from 1968-1975 and 5 stories in Arosio contributing to the rebuilding of Italy and defining the country as a locus for the study of flexible open prefabrication.

Edge detail of the suspended curtain wall

Prefabrication experiments - 467 - On and off-site Supply Chain Overlaps

Supply chains in building construction involve multiple project stakeholders, trades, and contractors charged with completing a building. Offsite construction implies harmonizing two diverse supply chains that overlap through final assembly. An electrical contractor hired for wiring and finishing a building chunk in the factory is often organized differently from the contractor that is then mandated to complete connections and coordinate the work on site. 

 

Trade duplication and imbrication can increase costs associated with sitework even if factory production is optimized. This is just one example of the complexities associated with harmonizing onsite construction culture with factory manufacturing. Professionals, suppliers, general contractors, inspection firms, specialized trades are contracted on a project-by-project basis, at worst chosen according to a lowest bid system or at best employed from project to project to harness some iterative traction. Moving from this type of fragmented ethos to an integrated manufacturing process argues for replication and product standardization: Deploying similar products, people, coordination and spreading costs over multiple projects.

 

Successfully reaching time and cost savings is contingent to bulk purchase orders for everything from surface materials like ceramics or drywall to plumbing pipes, sinks and fixtures. A scalable supply chain tuned to an ascertained output is the basis of industrialized production and should inform onsite construction management. Normalized grids, patterns, designs and details can facilitate and maintain a symbiotic relationship codifying assemblies and tasks.  

 

Occasionally compared to automobile manufacturing, furniture production or even shipbuilding, building is distinct from these products in its durable (50-100 years) anchoring to a particular site. This implies at the very least differentiated connections to infrastructure, foundations and structural specificity determined by locus criteria; constraints that impede complete reproduction as is the case of other commodities. Fine-tuning these two fields of production with their underlying supply chains remains one of the greatest challenges to prefabrication’s uptake; Contemporary design tools and digital twins are facilitating information exchange an important element for increased collaboration and potentially streamlining supply chain decisions. 

Clyde, Shu and alt. (2024) Offsite Construction Supply Chain Challenges: An Integrated Overview. 

In Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

Volume 150, Issue 7

Prefabrication experiments - 466 - Transport challenges

 

Archigram’s flying house, blending a mobile home with a high-capacity military grade helicopter, and Paul Rudolf’s classification of the mobile home as American vernacular define the complex relationship between the industrialized production of homes and architecture’s evolving perception of the low-cost factory built dwelling archetype. Architects have generally understood and promoted the arguments for manufacturing architecture in a streamlined, quality-controlled setting, delivering a 99% complete fabricated house to a client, however, transportation constraints and normalized outputs have been criticized for their inflexibility.

 

Modular volumetric construction seeks to reform this long-lasting friction by stacking premade customizable boxes, using the manufacturing lessons learned from the mobile home to make large-scale unique buildings. 

 

Whether mobile, manufactured or modular, the same underlying constraints that led to the 12’-wide homes and progressed into 14-foot and even 16-foot-wide modular boxes requiring special permits and chaperons, transport is the number one design criteria limiting modular volumetric’s formal diversification. Large scale chunk delivery limits spans, codifies metrics, and requires structural redundancy to make the large volumes robust enough to withstand rolling and bumping over long distances. 

 

Once delivered to their final destinations, the factory-finished boxes also imply large staging areas and cranes to set them in place to be stitched and weatherproofed. Long distances can also be prohibitive, remote locations, or even dense urban environments, all requiring increased logistics and special permitting for temporarily blocking traffic in tightly packed urban settings. Volume height is equally limited by overpass clearances making anything over 8-foot interior tricky without using low-bed vehicles. Notwithstanding these procedural challenges, the factory-finished large boxes sometimes up to 60’ long make quick work of any residential building as 12 x 60-foot modules can be carried on flatbed trucks requiring no special permits.

 

Transportability has long been highlighted as a central narrative in prefab architecture representing the freedom afforded by the moveable house able to adapt to any context, brought to site by road, sea or air supplying buildings as commodities ready to be used without the headaches of conventional construction.

top left: House 19 (Korteknie Stuhlmacher) ; top center: Sikorsky Sky Crane delivering a home ; right: UFO house carried to its site ; bottom left: The Flying House ; bottom center - modular buildings on a barge